《二十世紀(jì)》劇情介紹
《二十世紀(jì)》是由馬修·蘭金執(zhí)導(dǎo)，馬修·蘭金編劇，丹·貝爾尼,凱瑟琳·圣羅蘭等明星主演的喜劇,電影。
《二十世紀(jì)》是一部加拿大電影，靈感來源于加拿大前總理麥肯齊·金的日記。影片采用了超8和16mm攝影機(jī)拍攝，以真實(shí)的世界人物的語言為引用，同時(shí)通過大量場(chǎng)景和動(dòng)畫的運(yùn)用，營造出懷舊時(shí)代的氛圍。影片講述了一段荒誕怪奇的假傳記愛情故事，主要圍繞著麥肯齊·金和一個(gè)名叫艾達(dá)·艾爾斯沃思的女演員展開。麥肯齊·金是一個(gè)有野心的政治家，他希望通過影響艾達(dá)的演藝事業(yè)來實(shí)現(xiàn)自己的政治目標(biāo)。然而，艾達(dá)對(duì)麥肯齊的野心和控制欲感到厭倦，她渴望自由和個(gè)人發(fā)展。兩人之間的關(guān)系逐漸惡化，最終以悲劇收?qǐng)?。影片勇敢地觸及了一系列議題，包括反串、3P、戀鞋癖、種族和縱欲等。通過這些議題的處理，影片揭示了奠定加拿大基礎(chǔ)的沙文主義殖民態(tài)度，以及對(duì)權(quán)力和控制的反思?！抖兰o(jì)》是一部充滿愛與悲劇元素的電影，通過其獨(dú)特的拍攝手法和劇情設(shè)置，向觀眾展現(xiàn)了一個(gè)荒誕怪奇的世界，同時(shí)也引發(fā)了對(duì)社會(huì)和人性的思考。
《二十世紀(jì)》別名：麥肯齊金總理秘史♂(臺(tái)) The 20th Century，于2019-09-07上映，制片國家/地區(qū)為加拿大。時(shí)長共90分鐘，語言對(duì)白英語，最新狀態(tài)HD中字。該電影評(píng)分7.1分，評(píng)分人數(shù)1517人。
《二十世紀(jì)》評(píng)論
同類型電影
- 正片
世界大戰(zhàn)
伊娃·朗格利亞,艾斯·庫珀,奧利維婭·德勞倫蒂斯,邁克爾·奧尼爾,喬納森·丹尼爾·布朗,伊曼·本森,馬特·科博伊,伊戈·米基塔斯,Nicole,Pulliam,Henry,Hunter,Hall,Jake,Reiner,Harvey,B.,Jackson,Sydney,Heller
《二十世紀(jì)》影評(píng)
Can'tdecideifIshouldgiveita4.5ora0.5becauseitmademesoutterlyuncomfortableanddevastated.??！
《二十世紀(jì)》是一部充滿喜劇和傳記元素的電影，根據(jù)加拿大前總理麥肯齊·金的日記改編而成。導(dǎo)演運(yùn)用超8和16mm攝影機(jī)拍攝，巧妙地引用真實(shí)世界人物的語句，并通過場(chǎng)景和動(dòng)畫的運(yùn)用，營造出懷舊時(shí)代的氛圍。影片還涉及了反串、3P、戀鞋癖、種族和縱欲等議題，揭露了奠定加拿大基礎(chǔ)的沙文主義殖民態(tài)度。這種獨(dú)特的處理方式呈現(xiàn)了一段荒誕怪奇又充滿愛與悲劇的假傳記愛情故事。
這篇影評(píng)可能有劇透
The film depicts a brainwashing totalitarian society that promotes ultimate conservatism and extreme sexual repression. It is a cultish version of 1984 that is even more dystopian/hopeless/unredeemable than The Clockwork Orange. Its underlying Millennium-phobia and the allusions of yellow peril (casting Asian to play this mysterious doctor/villain) made me both sick and sad. The nostalgic mise-en-scene of (mainly) white and blue present a steep visual contrast between its seemingly harmless innocence and the inhuman atrocity that's been happening all this time in this shameful red Empire.
I'll leave the stars blank. God damn. What a fxxking journey to hell. I'm speechless.
Though, before I recede under my duvet and suffer from utter insomnia, I still have one question: I can't figure out exactly what the film wants to express by all that transvestism. Does it represent "if you're deep enough into the system, your 'queerness' would be legitimised no matter what" or "it is a facade of 'free speech/expression' (does the Empire of Disappointment really still need that though???)" or "it represents how utterly distorted the world is" (which is transphobic) or "they're only there for a laugh/for the quirkiness" (still transphobic), or neither?
